afnix/documents
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Should AFNix project representatives have a special membership status? #1

New issue
Open
opened 2025-07-08 14:19:17 +00:00 by delroth · 0 comments
delroth commented 2025-07-08 14:19:17 +00:00 (Migrated from git.lix.systems)
Copy link

It makes sense to try and ensure that representatives of projects hosted by AFNix have a voice in the org. I'm wondering if they should just be normal members, or members with a special status, or members with a dues exemption. The current status quo should work for now but is probably lacking guarantees we'd like to have in the future.

It makes sense to try and ensure that representatives of projects hosted by AFNix have a voice in the org. I'm wondering if they should just be normal members, or members with a special status, or members with a dues exemption. The current status quo should work for now but is probably lacking guarantees we'd like to have in the future.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
rules-current
bylaws-current
rules-2025-07-02
bylaws-2025-07-02
Labels
Clear labels   
bot

Automatic PRs created by bots

No labels
bot
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: afnix/documents#1
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?