feat(services/forgejo): generalize configuration #179
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Compat/Breaking
Difficulty/Architectural
Difficulty/Easy
Difficulty/Hard
Help Wanted
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Testing
Priority/Critical
Priority/High
Priority/Low
Priority/Medium
Reviewed/Confirmed
Reviewed/Duplicate
Reviewed/Invalid
Reviewed/Won't Fix
Security
Silenced Alert
Status/Abandoned
Status/Blocked
Status/Need More Info
Status/Postponed
Tracking Issue
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: afnix/infra#179
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/179/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
To welcome git.lix.systems in our ranks.
TODO:
nix-forgejo
to make it uniformSigned-off-by: Raito Bezarius masterancpp@gmail.com
@raito can you take a look at
41c66cb629..0b3487adfc
(force push diff) and let me know what you think?I removed a few things that are already the default upstream (like
services.mysql
andservices.forgejo.database.user
) and added an escape hatch (cfg.settings
) and moved"git.timeout".MIGRATE
out of the module.Similarly, the Lix-specific values in
ui
andsecurity.DISABLE_GIT_HOOKS
can live outside the module now.Also, is
security.DISABLE_GIT_HOOKS
actually actively used? I would prefer to drop it if not.The git.lix.systems config could look something like:
Click to expand WIP config
And I could restructure https://git.lix.systems/the-distro/nix-forgejo a bit and add a stable variant with the Lix patches instead of having them in-tree here.
I worry that we end up in a situation again where a simple nixpkgs bump is deferred because some patch does not apply.
@emilylange wrote in https://git.lix.systems/the-distro/infra/pulls/179#issuecomment-9035:
Looks good to me!