Contributing guideline #124
Labels
No labels
bug
dependency
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
review-next
security
stub
tool
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: raito/lanzaboote#124
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
We should create a contributing guideline. This should include our commit conventions (following nixpkgs) and a logging policy (as mentioned in #121). Ideally, we would have a
CONTRIBUTING.md
file that is linked from the README.In the contributing guide, will commits need to have
signed-off:<author-name>
(like for kernel contributions ?) and perhaps be GPG signed as well, for instance, or there is no need for anything like this yet, to be enforced, just thinking about a security standpoint.I'm not sure if enforcing this would need to deploy specific bot accounts, I've never enforced this kind of setup for a GH repository.
Maybe we can also scrap some documentation from here :
https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/
Or even link it, I'm not sure if it's relevant but from what I see for PR names, it might be.
There would also be the following benefits according to the "specification" of conventional commits :
No, I don't think we need to bother ourselves with GPG nonsense, neither with developer certificate of origins.
This is not relevant.
For the conventional stuff, I feel like you are trying to solve a technical problem.
Are these technical problems, something we should actively try to solve in order to have lesser friction for handling new contributions/reviewing and release maintenance ? Or this is not a key focus right now, as other things needs to be polished, first ?