systemd-stub feature parity #94
Labels
No labels
bug
dependency
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
review-next
security
stub
tool
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
raito/lanzaboote#94
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
We would like to have similar design and features as
systemd-stub, ideally, lanzastub should be a drop-in replacement tailored for NixOS:Random seed
SMBIOS
Addons support
Sections in the stub
Companion files
EFI variables passed to the OS
LoaderDevicePartUUIDLoaderFirmwareInfoLoaderFirmwareTypeLoaderImageIdentifierStubInfoStubFeaturesStubPcrKernelImageStubPcrKernelParametersStubPcrInitRDSysExtsWorking on this here makes it much harder for other people, especially systemd upstream but also maintainers of other distros to work on the next gen sd-stub in Rust. I'd rather see development happen somewhere else (maybe here: https://github.com/nikstur/sd-stub-rs) and then moved into the systemd namespace as soon as possible.
This is a useful tracker, thx @RaitoBezarius But since we won't use it here, I closed the issue.
As I am going to implement all of this first, then move it to sd-stub, I will track it here first.
DTB support and bootsplash are hard to do, they are blocked on upstream support.
@RaitoBezarius which upstream?
uefi-rs:)DTB is fixed now, bootsplash is still blocked.